﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Newsgator Forums / NewsGator Inbox / Desktop Clients  / Outlook 2007 Reader vs. InBox / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Newsgator Forums</description><link>http://forum.newsgator.com/</link><webMaster>info@newsgator.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:12:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Outlook 2007 Reader vs. InBox</title><link>http://forum.newsgator.com/Topic38369-1-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;Hey Everyone,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;I am new to the forum and have a question hopefully someone could answer. I was previously using FeedDemon and also Maxthon Browser's built-in aggregator for my RSS feeds. However, I decided to switch to Outlook 2007 RSS aggregator to give it a shot since I spend loads of time working with Outlook every day, but since Outlook 2007 uses Word to render email (html documents) I have been annoyed and rather not use it. Could someone explain the benefits of using InBox versus Outlook 2007 aggregator? What is most important to me is that I would much rather read the FULL article with all the photos in Outlook and not via my browser or a stand-alone client.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#111111&gt;-Spoon&lt;/FONT&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:37:19 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Spoon</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>